Case A01Climate Data · Logistics Strategy

Arctic Route Accessibility Analysis

Measured how many months a year Arctic shipping routes are actually open, using observed NSIDC sea-ice concentration grids from 1979 to 2025, and translated the result into distance saved on the Busan–Rotterdam leg.

Period · July 2026

Role · Individual project · polar big-data analysis

Source · GitHub repository

Quick read

The through-line of the work.

Open

The starting question

There is plenty of talk about shrinking ice, but it was hard to find anything that says in numbers how many months a ship can actually get through. So I fixed the target metric first: navigable months per year.

Build

What I checked

I laid a 50 km buffered corridor over each great-circle route onto the sea-ice grid and computed mean ice concentration and a 95th-percentile bottleneck value for every segment.

Turn

What changed my view

I did not report trends from OLS alone. Sea-ice data spikes in particular years, so I ran Theil-Sen robust regression alongside it and accepted a result only when both methods agreed in sign.

Close

Where I draw the line

What remained was not a statement that the Arctic has warmed but two numbers: about 3.4 months a year open to ice-1A/PC7-class vessels, and still zero months on the Transpolar route over the Pole.

01 · Start

The question I began with

How much has sea-ice loss changed the operational window of Arctic routes, and what choice does that leave a Korean shipper?

02 · Material

The data and evidence

NSIDC Sea Ice Index v4 monthly sea-ice concentration grids at 25 km, 1979–2025
SHA-256 checksum data manifest with idempotent ingestion scripts
Gridded-versus-official extent cross-check and 50 km buffer sensitivity analysis
CSV outputs recording OLS and Theil-Sen trends side by side, with roughly 30 tests
PythonpandasNumPyrasterioGeoPandasSciPystatsmodelspytest

03 · Work

How I worked through it

  1. 01

    Pin down provenance

    Ingested NSIDC gridded GeoTIFFs, fixed provenance with a SHA-256 checksum manifest, and cross-checked gridded extent against the official NSIDC series.

  2. 02

    Build route corridors

    Buffered the great-circle tracks of the Northern Sea Route, Northwest Passage, and Transpolar route by 50 km, rasterised them onto the ice grid, and split them into segments for bottleneck detection.

  3. 03

    Compute feasibility

    Applied per-vessel-class concentration thresholds to decide navigability by year and month, identified the limiting bottleneck segment, and aggregated navigable months per year.

  4. 04

    Validate trends and read scenarios

    Ran OLS alongside robust Theil-Sen and reported a trend only when both agreed, then framed the distance saving against Suez as logistics and cruise scenarios.

04 · Takeaway

What the numbers suggested

For ice-1A/PC7 vessels the NSR navigable season grew from about 0 months a year in the 1980s to about 3.4 months a year since 2015, a robust +0.9 months per decade where OLS and Theil-Sen agree.

September corridor sea-ice concentration fell about 3.2% per decade.

The NSR is 3,151 nautical miles, about 29.8%, shorter than the Suez routing for Busan–Rotterdam.

The Transpolar route is the shortest on paper but recorded zero navigable months across the entire record for non-icebreaking vessels.

Not claimed

  • Does not forecast future sea ice. Only past trends from observed grids.
  • Does not claim commercial navigability. Insurance, ports, icebreaker support, and regulation are excluded.
  • Does not claim domain expertise. GIS and climate data were explored with AI assistance.
Important boundary: Navigable months describe physical accessibility under concentration thresholds; they do not mean commercial transit is operationally viable.

05 · Use

Where this helps

Reduced the finding to two decision-grade numbers, navigable months per year and nautical miles saved, so routes can be compared on when and for how long they are usable.

06 · Boundary

What still needs checking

  • •This is an observation-based analysis, not a climate model that forecasts future ice.
  • •Navigability is judged on sea-ice concentration thresholds and excludes insurance, port, icebreaker-escort, and regulatory constraints.
  • •Some risk and cost layers in the extended Phase E analysis use synthetic stand-ins where real data was unavailable; these are labelled explicitly in the code.

07 · Figures

Tables and figures

Mean navigable months per decade

Verified source
1980s0.0 mo · n=11
1990s0.9 mo · n=10
2000s1.6 mo · n=10
2010s3.2 mo · n=10
2020-20253.2 mo · n=6

Decade means recomputed from the project's own output table. Sampling covers June–November and counts a month as navigable when it clears the concentration threshold; it does not imply commercial viability.

Source · outputs/tables/nsr_annual_navigability.csv · NSIDC Sea Ice Index v4 (ice-1A/PC7)

Trend validation and distance saving

Verified source

OLS slope

+0.92 months/decade

Theil-Sen slope

+0.83 months/decade

Fit · significance

R² = 0.66 · p < 0.001

Saving versus Suez

3,151 nm · 29.8%

A trend counts only when OLS and Theil-Sen agree in sign. The distance saving is computed on great-circle routings and excludes port access and operating cost.

Source · outputs/tables/trends_navigable_months.csv · outputs/tables/logistics_vs_suez.csv